The 16th Foundation newsletter went out last night, and although much of it was very similar to the press release (with a few extra justifications after the howls of derision), there was a list of improvements that have been made to RISC OS that would be available to Select scheme members.
I haven't reproduced the entire newsletter - get a subscription if you're that interested - but hopefully, after all the flak he's been getting, Paul won't mind you seeing this list of RISC OS improvements.
| |
What's in the RISC OS Select scheme? |
| |
(12:46 24/5/2001)
mark quint (14:53 24/5/2001)
Chris Williams (20:07 24/5/2001)
David Taylor (20:42 24/5/2001)
Simon Wilson (00:49 25/5/2001)
mark quint (06:33 25/5/2001)
Rob Kendrick (11:59 25/5/2001)
John Whitington (16:57 25/5/2001)
Tim Fountain (20:08 25/5/2001)
John Whitington (21:41 25/5/2001)
|
| |
|
Andrew Weston |
Message #88621, posted at 12:46, 24/5/2001 |
| Unregistered user
|
Sounds great. I'm sure it'll be worth the money. |
| |
 [ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
mark quint |
Message #88622, posted at 14:53, 24/5/2001, in reply to message #88621 |
| Unregistered user
|
played ROL! :D |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Chris Williams |
Message #88623, posted at 20:07, 24/5/2001, in reply to message #88622 |
| Unregistered user
|
Good god, that list is awesome :) I take my hat off to ROL.
Chris |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
David Taylor |
Message #88624, posted at 20:42, 24/5/2001, in reply to message #88623 |
| Unregistered user
|
If ROL was designated a National Treasure,
would it be liable for a Lottery Grant?
Lobby your PPC |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Simon Wilson |
Message #88625, posted at 00:49, 25/5/2001, in reply to message #88624 |
| Unregistered user
|
"System application support for the global clipboard allowing cutting and pasting between compliant applications": RISC OS 4 already does this, as far as I know. I can copy text from Oregano and paste it in Ovation Pro. What's new here? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
mark quint |
Message #88626, posted at 06:33, 25/5/2001, in reply to message #88625 |
| Unregistered user
|
I guess it'd be proper cut & paste where you can copy images & other media as well as text. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Rob Kendrick |
Message #88627, posted at 11:59, 25/5/2001, in reply to message #88626 |
| Unregistered user
|
This is better served by PCA, IMHO. (Phoebe was ment to ship with PCAPaint, anyway) |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Whitington |
Message #88628, posted at 16:57, 25/5/2001, in reply to message #88627 |
| Unregistered user
|
Could some kind soul explain to me what people see in Cut and Paste between applications? If I want to export data between apps, I use drag and drop. If I want a persistant multi-clipboard with image thumbnails, I use a RAM Disc. I can understand Cut & Paste within an application (e.g OvPro), but why is it useful globally, when the methods I have described above are already universally supported (and faster, and more flexible)? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Tim Fountain |
Message #88629, posted at 20:08, 25/5/2001, in reply to message #88628 |
| Unregistered user
|
IMO the main advantage of cut-and-paste over drag and drop is for copying portions of something. If you wanted to get this paragraph of text from your browser into an email, how would you do it? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John Whitington |
Message #88630, posted at 21:41, 25/5/2001, in reply to message #88629 |
| Unregistered user
|
Well, I'm using oregano, So I can't select text. But with most apps (I've just checked StrongED / Writer) using the shift key reverses the normal function (i.e copies rather than moves or moves rather than copies). Perhaps everyone implementing this would be (ideally) better than cut & paste.
I think it comes down to whether or not a mixture of drag & drop and cut & paste confuses novice users. I'm yet to decide which I think is the case. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
